DC Physics logo

HOME


space

 

 

Entropy, Disorder and Evolution

August 2000

The Challenge

A common formulation of the Second Law of Thermodynamics is that the entropy of an isolated system never decreases. The challenge for anybody who wants to disprove evolution with this form of the Second Law is thus:
  1. Define an isolated system where the law will be violated. This means no energy or matter comes in or out. No heat, light, molecules... nothing!
  2. Show that after some period of time evolution would cause the system to achieve a lower entropy (as measured in J/K) than what it had at the beginning. (Yes the introductory level physics "trick" of dimensional analysis can be used here: if you cannot express it in J/K then it isn't entropy.)
Many years ago somebody came up with the idea that since the Second Law of Thermodynamics states that the disorder of a system is always increasing, the theory or evolution is contrary to basic physics. Physicists have been denying this ever since, but our objections have not been pursuasive enough to end the argument. My own contribution Entropy, God and Evolution (location updated in 2008) is perhaps typical. While the comments I've received (mainly from other physicists) in the last 4 years have convinced me that I should make a few changes when I get the time... I think the main reason the page doesn't have a very big impact is that it attempts to teach too much physics. There's too much to swallow in one bite for anybody who is new to the issues.

In this feature my approach will be different. A few obvious examples should be readily understood by anybody.

Does the Second Law say that Disorder Always Increases?

NO!

We observe lots of cases in this world where the natural course is increasing order. Here are just a few examples:

  • Crystals: the natural state of most solids is crystal - the atoms line up in orderly fashions. For most materials it takes much deliberate effort to make it non-crystalline.
  • Marbles: try this... take a bag of marbles and randomly drop them into a small bowl. They come to rest in orderly layers and form hexagonal patterns. Very natural order arising out of disorder.
  • Rain: When it rains we have water molecules distributed over a huge area of sky become more ordered by forming into tiny droplets, then become more ordered still by falling to the ground and gathering into relatively small volumes.

BUT: If I throw a stack of papers into the air it starts ordered and ends up disordered
This is true, and it may even be cited in a statistical mechanics class in order to introduce entropy. The reason is that this is an example of how you can use Laplace's principle of insufficient reason to analyze likely outcomes in dynamic situations, and we are then going to proceed to do something similar for entropy. In other words, this is an analogy to help us understand something microscopic and it is not to be taken literally. When we say "entropy is disorder" after making this analogy, we have defined a very specific type of disorder. To apply this definition of disorder to the world around us will be like measuring the "power of an argument" in Watts. Most cases of what we perceive as "disorder" has little if anything to do with entropy, and hence little to do with the Second Law of Thermodynamics.

Summary

Some counter examples show that the Second Law of Thermodynamics does not forbid systems becoming more ordered. Any attempt to disprove the theory of evolution using thermodynamics will require proper formalisms.

DC Physics Home Page | More DC Physics Notes